Karunanidhi To Turn 94 On Saturday

The grand old man of Indian politics M Karunanidhi, who turns 95 on Saturday, will celebrate his birthday on a big scale amidst top opposition leaders of the country.

Chennai: Tamil Nadu former Chief Minister, DMK Supremo Karunanidhi will be recognised as the octogenarian political leader. He will turn 95 on June 3 and is considered as the eldest of all the prominent political leaders in the country. A grand birthday celebration has been planned for Saturday for which several top leaders from opposition parties are expected to fly down to Chennai.

As none of the chief ministers, Union ministers, Governors, Prime Ministers or Presidents of the major parties is of that age, he is recognised as the eldest in the contemporary politics.

Karunanadhi was one of the main pillars of Tamil Nadu politics since 1969. He has been the president of DMK for the past 48 years. Political sources are saying that it is a world record. A single person did not lead a political party for such a long time.

Karunanidhi is known as a journalist, fiction writer, poet, scriptwriter, actor, producer and educationist. His writings are sharp and catchy; they easily get into the hearts and minds of people. It is also said that during his early days in politics, he used to write the script for speeches of political leaders and when the leaders read them people get excited. Even Telugu leaders who were know for their oratory skills used to copy his phrases.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

గవర్నర్ చర్యను ప్రశ్నించిన కరుణానిధి

  • పన్నీర్ సెల్వమ్ కు బాధ్యల అప్పగింతపై అభ్యంతరం
  • జయలలిత సలహా ఎలా పొందారో చెప్పాలని డిమాండ్

చెన్నై: ముఖ్యమంత్రి జయలలిత అపోలో ఆసుపత్రిలో చికిత్స పొందుతూ రోజుల తరబడిగా విధులకు దూరంగా ఉన్న పరిస్థితిలో ఆర్థికమంత్రి ఓ. పన్నీర్ సెల్వమ్ ను మంత్రివర్గ సమావేశాలకు అధ్యక్షత వహించవలసిందిగా గవర్నర్ సిహెచ్, విద్యాసాగర్ రావు కోరడంపై డీఎంకే అధినేత, మాజీ ముఖ్యమంత్రి కె. కరుణానిధి అభ్యంతరం వ్యక్తం చేశారు. తమిళనాడు పరిపాలనకు ఇంచార్జీగా పన్నీర్ సెల్వమ్ ను నియమించవలసిందిగా జయలలిత లిఖితపూర్వకంగా కోరారా అని 93 ఏళ్ల కరుణానిధి ప్రశ్నించారు.  ముఖ్యమంత్రిని చూడడానికి ఎవరినీ అనుమతించనప్పుడు గవర్నర్ ఆమె సలహా ఎలా పొందగలిగారని ఆయన ప్రశ్నించారు. ఈ విషయంలో ప్రభుత్వం వివరణ ఇవ్వాలని ఆయన డిమాండ్ చేశారు.

సెప్టెంబర్ 22 నుంచి ఆసుపత్రిలో చికిత్స పొందుతున్న జయలలితను చూడడానికి రాహుల్ గాంధీ, వెంకయ్య నాయుడు, ఎం డిమ్ ఎం కె నాయకుడు వైగో, ఇంకా మరికొందరు వెళ్లారు కానీ, ఇంటెన్సివ్ కేర్ యూనిట్ లో ఉన్న ఆమెను వాస్తవంగా చూడలేకపోయారు. జయలలితను చూడడానికి రావాలనుకున్న ప్రధాని నరేంద్ర మోడి చూసే అవకాశం లేదని తెలిసి తన చెన్నై ప్రయాణాన్ని రద్దు చేసుకున్నారు.  చికిత్సకు ఆమె స్పందిస్తోందని డాక్టర్లు అంటున్నారు. ఆమె శ్వాస సంబంధమైన సపోర్ట్ మీద ఉన్నారు. ఎక్కువ కాలం ఆమె ఆసుపత్రిలో ఉండాల్సివస్తుందని డాక్టర్లు ఇప్పటికే చెప్పారు. అందుకే దైనందిన పాలనా వ్యవహారాలను పర్యవేక్షించడానికి ఒక తాత్కాలికమైన ఏర్పాటు అవసరమని గవర్నర్ భావించినట్టు అర్థమవుతోంది. జయలలిత చట్ట రీత్యా ముఖ్యమంత్రిగా కొనసాగే అవకాశం లోపించినప్పుడు 2001-02లో , 2014-15లో పన్నీర్ సెల్వమ్ తాత్కాలిక ముఖ్యమంత్రిగా నియమితులయ్యారు.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Karuna Doubts Governor Rao

  • Did Jaya Give Advice In Writing?

Chennai: DMK supremo M Karunanidhi expressed his reservations about the decision of Governor Ch Vidyasagar Rao asking Tamil Nadu Finance Minister O Panneerselvam to preside over cabinet meetings in the absence of Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa who has been undergoing treatment at Apollo Hospital. The 93-year old former chief minister asked if Jayalalithaa had given her advice in writing suggesting to make Panneerselvam in charge of the governance in Tamil Nadu. When no one was allowed to meet Jaya, how the governor could get her advice, he asked.  Karunanidhi demanded a clarification from the government.

Since her admission to Apollo Hospital on September 22, a number of senior politicians, including Union Minister Venkaiah Naidu, Congress Vice President Rahul Gandhi, MDMK chief Vaigo, had visited the hospital but could not actually see the chief minister as she has been in ICU (Intensive Care Unit).

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has cancelled his programme to travel to Chennai since visitors are not allowed to see her.  BJP president Amit Shah and Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley landed here on Wednesday. They will visit the hospital to enquire about her health.

Doctors treating the 68-year old chief minister said that she is responding to the treatment. She is on respiratory support system. Doctors said she needs to be in hospital for a prolonged period. That was the reason why the governor had to make an interim arrangement to take care of the day-to-day administration of the state.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

How safe are our roads?

S.Madhusudhana Rao

Saturday, the 13th of June, was one of the deadliest days in India’s road transport history. For, a total of 43 passengers were killed across the country on roads while travelling in bus, car and other kinds of vehicles. The number was officially confirmed deaths from states like Andhra Pradesh, Punjab and Uttar Pradesh. The fatal accidents were extensively reported in the media and the reasons for the crashes were explained and debated. It’s possible that the actual road deaths toll on that day could be higher since many accidents might have gone unreported or they were not brought to police notice, a common phenomenon in rural areas.

S.Madhusudhana Rao

S. Madhusudhana Rao

According to the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, one serious accident takes place every minute and one person dies every four minutes on the road. Thus we have the dubious distinction of recording the highest number of fatal accidents in the world year after year. Still, very little has been done to arrest the trend and whatever initiatives have been taken at the central and states’ level to minimize the number of avoidable road accidents have been doomed, thanks to vested interests.

Among the initiatives to make roads safer to travel is the Modi government’s Road Safety Bill proposed last year. But it is yet to be passed by parliament because trade unions and opposition parties have dubbed it ‘draconian.’ Even protests were held in many states on April 30 this year to denounce some of the provisions in the bill which prescribe stringent punishments, including jail terms and heavy penalties, for offenders.

One of the strong opponents of the bill is DMK supremo M Karunanidhi.  He insists the bill violates the federal spirit by taking away the rights of states. In what way a bill that is intended to ensure better road safety erodes the rights of states MK has not explained.

However, the original version of the Road Safety Bill that was drafted to replace the 1988 Motor Vehicles Act had some tough provisions. They were intentionally introduced by the Modi government after the Supreme Court strictures and complaints from a number of citizens and NGOs that the existing laws were inadequate to deal with an ever increasing number of road deaths in the country.

For example, the original bill had proposed removal of liquor shops on highways, five to ten-fold hike in fines even for minor offences and holding government officials and contractors responsible for faulty and sub-standard roads. The first draft of the bill had faced stiff opposition from all quarters except some activists who wanted the central government and the Supreme Court to crack down on speed maniacs and irresponsible drivers. However, the first draft had not cut much ice with the opponents of the bill.

It had been redrafted five times and is expected to be introduced in the monsoon session of parliament now. It is anybody’s guess whether the watered-down bill will get the parliamentarians’ nod. If it goes through, it will be a defanged version of an otherwise potent Act to effectively deal with the rising number of road deaths in India. Then the logical question is does the new law in a new avatar –old wine in new bottle – serve the intended purpose?

It is an acknowledged fact that the outdated Motor Vehicles Rules and paltry fines for traffic offenders are major contributory factors to the mounting road death toll. What is shocking is no worthwhile effort has been made in the last few years to strengthen road safety laws in relation to the growing volume of vehicles.

It’s worth mentioning here what Justice Ranjan Gogoi of Supreme Court said in dealing with a PIL on road safety. His observation should also be a reminder to authorities of their responsibility to public safety on roads. “Regular maintenance of all highways and roads both by the Central and the State governments, in order to make the same traffic worthy, is the minimum that the citizens of this country can expect and are entitled to.”

Sadly, on both counts of road maintenance and law enforcement, authorities have failed. In contrast, another developing country and our neighbor China has succeeded in reversing the deadly trend.

Obviously, government efforts to gradually decrease the number of road traffic accidents by setting up four working groups have not had any effect. The areas they were supposed to cover included enforcement of laws; accident-free engineering of roads; educating road users; and care of accident victims. While the four-pronged approach is tailor-made to tackle the issue, the problem arises with its implementation in letter and spirit.

For example, punishments given to those who have caused fatal road crashes show very few drivers have been given exemplary or deterrent punishments. In several cases, vehicle drivers have got away with what the public believes murder of innocent people. Drunk and irresponsible driving and speeding resulting in loss of life and limb are causes for concern in a country that has been adding hundreds of vehicles every day.

Given the condition of roads in urban areas and their poor maintenance by civic bodies, fatal accidents are waiting to happen. While traffic management is a challenge to the law enforcing authorities, punishing the offenders to deter them and others from repeating the violations is in the realm of law. In other words, concerted efforts should be made by all – government, public, judiciary and traffic police –to curb the alarming incidence of road deaths.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.